New commercial buildings, from a bare site.

Ground-up commercial construction across South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales. Offices, education and community facilities, clinics and mixed-use buildings.

A completed two-storey commercial building in precast concrete and glass, illustrative of the building type
Project capacity under a single contract
$20m
States we build in: South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales
3
JCGAU builder licence
BLD 344769
Years of the director’s delivery experience
15+

The premise

On a new build, the site is rarely what sets the date.

Approvals, service connections and long-lead elements are all decided off-site, by people who do not work for you, on timelines you cannot compress.

A new building is the one project type where the construction programme is the shorter half of the story. Between a decision to build and a slab pour sits a sequence of consents, referrals, utility applications and procurement commitments, and each of them has a queue.

So the first thing we do on a new build is not price the building. It is map what has to be lodged, ordered or applied for, and when. That map is the programme. Everything else follows it.

Diagram of the Australian approval path for a commercial new build, showing that planning approval, building approval and occupancy are three separate consents with different names in South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales, and that the two long-lead items outside the approval path are the service connection application and the long-lead building elements.

The consent path: three separate approvals, not one

  1. Three separate approvals

    • Planning

      Land use, form, amenity, car parking, referrals

    • Building

      Code compliance, fire safety, structural, access

    • Occupancy

      Essential safety measures, certificates, sign-off

  2. Each state calls them something different

    • SA. Planning consent, building rules consent, development approval
    • VIC. Planning permit, building permit, occupancy permit
    • NSW. Development consent, construction certificate, occupation certificate
  3. These two run beside the approvals, not after them.

    Started late, they set the date.

    • Service connection applications

      Power, water, sewer, telecommunications. Not part of the consent path. Longer than it.

    • Long-lead building elements

      Façade, lifts, switchboards, plant. Ordered off design, not off approval.

Planning, building and occupancy are three separate consents, and the names change across the three states we work in. The two items in copper sit outside the consent path entirely. They are the ones that most often set the completion date.

Before the site

What we do in the first six weeks.

  1. SiteGeotechnical investigation, survey, contamination history, existing services located rather than assumed. Everything under the ground that is discovered later is a variation.
  2. AuthorityThe referral bodies for this site and this use, identified and approached early. A referral nobody knew about is the single most common cause of a programme reset.
  3. ServicesLoad and demand estimated well enough to lodge connection applications, because the distributor’s clock does not start until the application does.
  4. ProcurementWhich elements are fabricated to order and therefore have to be designed first. Façade, lifts, switchboards, generation and specialist plant, in that order of pain.

The programme

Five streams, and the one that finishes last.

The building is not usually the thing that decides the completion date.

Schedule diagram of a commercial new build. Five streams run concurrently from award: design, planning and building approvals, service connection applications, long-lead procurement, and construction. Construction starts last but the service connection stream is the one that runs furthest to the right, so energisation, not the building, sets practical completion. No durations are shown.

Design

Planning and building approvals

Service connection applications

Long-lead procurement

Construction

Commissioning and handover

The copper stream is the one nobody owns and everybody waits for. It is lodged in week one on our projects.

Every stream starts at award. Construction begins last and still is not the constraint, because the connection application sits outside everybody’s control and runs furthest to the right. No durations are shown, because they belong to a specific project rather than to a web page.

Structure and envelope

The two decisions that shape everything after them.

Structural system
Steel frame, in-situ concrete or precast, each with a different balance of programme, weather exposure, crane requirement and site footprint. On a constrained urban site the choice is often made by the crane and the truck access, not by the engineer.
Façade
The longest-lead element on most commercial buildings, and the one most often still being resolved when it needs to be ordered. It also carries the thermal performance the building is assessed on and, since the cladding reforms, a materials compliance trail that has to be documented rather than assumed.
Vertical transport
Lifts are ordered against a shaft that has to be built accurately. The lift supplier’s programme is not negotiable in the way a trade programme is.
Services strategy
Whether plant sits on the roof, in a basement or in a plant room changes the structure, the acoustics, the façade and the useable floor area. It is a concept decision that is frequently deferred to detail design, where it becomes expensive.
Weather
Every programme we issue identifies when the building becomes weathertight, because that date governs when every internal trade can start. A programme that does not show it is not a programme.

A referral nobody identified is not a delay. It is a restart.

A completed school teaching building with a covered walkway and courtyard, illustrative of the building type

Sustainability

Written into the contract, or it does not happen.

Energy performance is now a compliance requirement rather than an aspiration, and where a client is pursuing a rating, the evidence has to be collected during construction, not assembled afterwards from whatever records happen to exist.

We treat rating evidence the way we treat any other deliverable: a named person, a due date and a place it is filed. Commissioning records, product data, waste tracking and air-tightness results are collected as the work happens. Retrospective evidence is either unavailable or expensive, and usually both.

Working with us

What makes the first conversation useful.

  • The site, and whether you own itTitle, survey, easements and any existing approval. Conditional purchases change the sequence completely.
  • What the building is forUse class drives the code path, the fire strategy and the referrals. It is the single most informative thing you can tell us.
  • Who is designing it, if anyone yetA design already in progress and a blank page are different starting points, and neither is a problem.
  • The date that actually mattersA lease expiry, a funding milestone, an academic year, a season. Programmes built backwards from a real date behave differently from programmes built forwards from a start.
  • The budget, honestlyIncluding whether it is a board-approved figure or an aspiration. We would rather tell you early that the brief and the budget do not meet.

Projects

Prior firm: the director’s contribution at a previous firm, not JCGAU-delivered work.

Questions

Can you help before we own the site?

Yes, and it is often the most valuable point to be involved. Feasibility, buildability and an order-of-cost view before a purchase decision is cheaper than discovering the constraint after.

Do you work with our architect, or do you bring your own?

Either. On a traditional contract we build to your consultant team’s documents. Under design and construct we can bring a team or take yours across by novation.

How early do you need the design finished?

Not finished. Resolved in the right order. The elements that get fabricated need to be designed first, and finishes can be settled much later than most people assume.

What is the most common cause of a blown programme on a new build?

A service connection or an authority referral that was not identified at the start. Both are visible in week one to anyone who goes looking.

Send us the site and the use.

With those two things we can tell you what the approval path looks like, what has a queue in front of it, and where the programme risk actually sits.